Los Angeles Times
The Los Angeles Times recently published an article about DPL’s that is interesting but not thorough in that it doesn’t explain the parameters and the differences between the two loan programs. If anyone is going to consider one over the other it is important to know how they compare to one another. Here is what is important to know when researching the details of the two mortgages.
1. DPL’S are usually offered by states or cities.
2. But how the funds are used from the loan are restricted. Typically they can be used to pay taxes or special assessments, home repairs or energy efficient improvements and not for cost of living expenses.
3. The amount of the money will vary from state to state or city and it will be considerably less than a person could receive from a Reverse loan.
If a senior does not need additional money for living expenses and is comfortable with the amount the money that they receive through Social Security and possibly a pension but needs money for those situations that a DPL loan could provide, then it might be a good choice. But in the end a Reverse mortgage is far superior, more funds, flexibility and no restrictions on how the money can be spent.
L.A. Times on Reverse Mortgage Alternatives
May 2nd, 2011 | by Elizabeth Ecker Published in News, Reverse Mortgage | 4 Comments
The L.A. Times published an article this week covering some alternatives to taking out a reverse mortgage loan. The article, titled, “Elder homeowners might want to consider reverse mortgage alternatives,” offers options it calls alternatives to reverse mortgages including deferred payment loans (DPLs), property tax deferral (PTD) loans and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, and outlines several housing options.
The article doesn’t address pros and/or cons of reverse mortgages, instead it offers additional options.
“Reverse mortgages may very well be a good choice for some seniors who need to tap into equity they have in their homes,” the article states, before outlining the alternatives. “But there are other options elder owners might also want to consider.”
For DPLs, the L.A. Times writes, generally there are no origination fees and insurance premiums and closing costs are low, as are interest rates. As for a PTD loan, the article states, “Generally, it provides annual advances that can be used only to pay your property taxes or a portion thereof.
But no repayment is required for as long as you live in the house.” They are only available in some areas, however. For SSI benefits, the article explains, seniors may be eligible if their liquid resources total less than $3,000 for a couple or $2,000 for an individual.
For those who don’t qualify for a reverse mortgage or for whom reverse mortgages proceeds are not sufficient, the article suggests three housing alternatives: accessory apartments, ECHO cottages and sharing arrangements.
Written by Elizabeth Ecker